Thursday, May 10, 2012

stereotypes-- starring you!

I am not one of those pretentious people that doesn't see the value in something being purely meant for entertainment. Usually, things in that category are some what sensational and exaggerated, and I get that.

For example-- musical theatre. I wish I lived I a world where everyone randomly broke out in song and dance and the perfect interlude punctuated the emotions of the moment. Also, satirical comedy. It is funny because it exaggerates stereotypes and forces people portrayed in those situations-- or the people that have to deal with them-- to laugh at their absurdity. Situational comedy and scripted drama are also useful because they offer an escape into a world where someone else is having a meltdown and you can use those portrayals to gain perspective. I am all for all of those kinds of entertainment.

What I am NOT for, however, are shows that stereotype demographics of which I am a member.

When the first season of The Real Housewives of Orange County first appeared on Bravo, I will admit, I was a fan. Because though it was "unscripted", it was a peek into the lives of over indulged and under developed women in California. I enjoyed watching Vicki, Jo, Lauri and Jeana spend absurd amounts of money on ridiculous things, all the while peppered with a colorful commentary of ridiculously asinine thoughts and musings. I found them to be laughable, and thus, was entertained by how far away from reality they actually lived.

Well, that was almost 5 years ago. And now, in a market where anything that is successful is repackaged and reproduced for every different population segment under the sun, television is inundated with the same kind of ridiculous shit show of women and their over indulged lifestyles.

And now, the very thing I found entertaining about these kinds of shows, has taken a rather insidious turn as the "real life" drama is now being packed for fictional characters. Specifically for a specific kind of woman that lives in Texas.

I have actually read Good Christian Bitches, a novel based upon a series of one woman's experiences living in Highland Park and I actually enjoyed the book. What you see on ABC entitled GCB is very little like the novel it is supposedly based on. The woman's entire point in writing the book was to highlight that in a faith community in which she was attempting to find sanctuary, she found more deceit, betrayal and usurping than you would find in a sorority house. Her character in the book was attempting to start her life over with the best of intentions, and was genuinely disheartened to find that the women she used to consider her best friends were eager to feed her to the wolves.

The book was a fictional case study of life; not Dallas. It was supposed to offer a look into how faith communities can sometimes offer more alienation than solace and that a lot of times, people use God and bible study for an agenda rather than the Truth.

I've only forced myself to sit through one episode of GCB, and I can assure you, that is not the motif they are going for.

And in keeping with the Real Housewives genre, Bravo hasn't moved to take on Dallas as a new locale, but Style did when they started Big Rich Texas.

When I first saw the promotional ads for the show, I had no interest in tuning in. However, lack of other viable options and a waning lack of attention to television programming led me to watch the show a couple of nights ago. I was disgusted. Furthermore, I am even more irate that I have to live with the fact that I share a zip code with all of these individuals.

What these women and their daughters may have in liquid wealth gives no credence to what that indescribably lack in class. Not just because they are all backstabbing, deceitful idiots, but because they try to use an air of "southern charm" to accompany their couture. Combined, they make Teresa Guidice look like bambi. One girl has sex with her godmother's son and can barely pull the sheets up over her breasts long enough for the camera to get a post-coitus angle. One woman- arguably the Queen B with the most money- has a trashier mouth than I do...and for those of you that know me, that's saying something. 

And we know all of their dirty secrets, unpaid balances at the plastic surgeon and hidden pregnancies because each and every time they all find themselves at the same social event, they end the evening screaming at each other with unbridled profanity about how trashy the other one is. It is beyond the limits of entertainment; it's a train wreck.

And I guess this is what I don't understand. I am absolutely incensed that people that do not live in Texas have this as an image of Texas women. Furthermore, when shows like GCB pop up and offer a fictional insight into the same southern city, people are only further beguiled by the behavior. 

I have lived in Texas my whole life. I have moved around for college and work, but never have I had a zip code that didn't start with a '7'. I have known a lot of women in this state- rich and poor- and none of them behave the way these women do. Not even close. I am offended the popular culture is categorizing women of my geographical location in this way-- and that I will forever now- without my consent- be a party to the same stereotypical behavior.

This is the new Texas generation that once used to get the question, "do you go everywhere on a horse?" I thought the question was absurd, but it makes sense if you compare it to most of the popular images of the residents of Texas.

Well, now I am forever to be counted amongst the trash of Dallas/Fort Worth; I get to fight against the negative perception that have given women in this city and what kills me is that people in this market to not seem to be bothered about how they are being portrayed on television! I feel like I owe the women of Orange Country an apology because back when the drama was 3000 miles away from me, I thought it was funny. Now, not so much.

Sandra Day O'Connor is from Texas. She worked her way up form humble beginnings, lived life on the range, and worked her ass off all the way to the Supreme Court. I would much rather be represented by that "big rich Texas" personality than anything else that has been put up there thus far.


Wednesday, May 9, 2012

let the gays get married. seriously.

I am speechless right now. The only indicator of the true depth of my disappointment and fury is the knot I have growing in my stomach.

http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/these-are-the-people-who-are-happy-amendment-one-p

This link will take you to a page where a site has compiled the Facebook statuses of individuals in praise of the outcome of yesterday's Amendment 1 vote in North Carolina. I read every single one of them. And here I sit literally unsure of where to begin because I have so much to say on the subject.

I am a straight, white, Christian woman who went to over twelve years of Catholic school. I learned that abortion was wrong probably before I learned how to write and spell my name, and was constantly reminded of "right" and "wrong" and how God would want me to live my life. In some ways, I have done a good job in that department; in other ways, I have failed miserably. Over and Over again. I am an imperfect person who has sinned everyday in my past and will continue to sin everyday in my future. This is as true of me as it is of every other human being walking this earth.

The majority of the statuses I read on that website made mention of the action of homosexuality being a sin and even one lesser hateful individual said that, "God loves the sinner but hates the sin." Well, then, is that not true of each and every one of us who lies, cheats, steals, covets our neighbor's wife or TV, curses, misses church and puts other things in our lives ahead of God? Where are the laws that are getting passed (or being voted out) that prohibit the proposed behavior of the sinner? Because it is God's way? Or is or is not mentioned in the bible?

By that logic, it is fair to say that God may love a murdered, but hates murder; why are guns legal? God loves his children, but just about any Christian denomination would argue that he does not like divorce; why is divorce legal? Does the bible not say turn the other cheek? Does the bible not say, "Thou shall not kill?" Yet states in this union EXECUTE their imprisoned and fetuses are ripped from their mother's wombs, yet where is everyone decrying the existences of those institutions in accordance with biblical teaching? No one is, not really. Because arguments against gay marriage are self serving, ridiculously prostrated by God and possibly the most close-minded concept since "separate but equal".

At the end of the day, how does someone else's differing life choices devalue your own? They don't unless you let them. I don't agree with Scientology; I think the entire "religion" and those that blindly follow it are absurd. However, their loyalty to their faith does not undermine that of my own to my religion. Or lack thereof. Their blind allegiance does not infringe on my life or my values. To each their own; that is their business.

How do to members of the same sex pledging love, life and a commitment to each other take away from your heterosexual union? HOW? You can use the bible as a shield and God as an excuse, but no one has yet offered a legitimate answer to that question.

This country is so quick to look at the lives and value systems of people in other countries and determine that their way of life is wrong or unjust. And in all of those situations, various segments of society are being persecuted in one way or another. In the middle east, women are second class citizens and in the Sudan, an entire civilization is being wiped out. And while Americans here at home haven't taken to the streets with guns and bombs to eradicate homosexuality, their refusal to bestow upon those members of society the same civil rights all other citizens of this country behold comes from the exact same sentiment-- their belief that these people are unworthy and undeserving of such inalienable rights.
Forgive me, but does the bible also not say that we are all God's children? And that ultimate judgement of a person comes from the Father himself? Why is it we can deny a gay man or woman's right to marriage as an infringement on morality, yet manage to violate that same ideology while doing it?

All I can think of, because I think it is pretty obvious to this point that I DO NOT get this hatred and judgemental argument, is that these people that blindly vote to support a prejudicial law and blatant civil rights violation, do not know a gay man or woman. Have not seen a gay man or woman in a loving, committed relationship. I would like to believe that their ignorance comes from not actually knowing any men or women who are affected by these laws.

Because I do. And I know a lot of them. A man I respect up there with some of the best teachers and professors I have ever had is a proudly open gay man. He taught me how to have an open mind, bestow unwavering acceptance and always operate with an awareness of how words and actions can suggest something to others you might not really mean. From him, I became a better person. From him, I learned how to love greater. To him, I am eternally grateful.

And this man loves someone who he can't make a lifelong commitment to. And not because he doesn't want to; because he can't. Denying them this right is akin to denying them a right to drive. What if you were not allowed to drive because your fellow citizens voted that you, because you disagree with the bible, don't deserve the right to drive. Sound absurd?

Exactly.




And seriously, Adam and Steve? It's not funny now, it wasn't funny then and really, it the most over-played, not funny, homophobic epithet I've ever heard. If you insist on being a judgemental prick, at least get some better material.